The Landscape Perception as Pasemon Artistic in Wayang Kayon Figure

The Landscape Perception as Pasemon Artistic in Wayang Kayon Figure

Authors

  • Pandu Pramudita Institut Seni Indonesia, Surakarta
  • Sarwanto Institut Seni Indonesia, Surakarta
  • Soetarno Institut Seni Indonesia, Surakarta
  • Dendi Pratama Politeknik Bina Madani, Bekasi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v38i2.2096

Keywords:

landscape, perception, pasemon artistic, kayon figure

Abstract

Wayang Kayon filling is often understood as an ornament that is interpreted separately. The fillings are composed in such a way that they interact. The interaction between Wayang Kayon fillings forms landscape perception. This study aims to explain landscape perception in Wayang Kayon figures. The theory used to explain the landscapes depicted on Wayang Kayon figures is the perception theory. This research uses qualitative methods with an interpretive-iconographic approach. The Wayang Kayon filling is three composed layers of the structure, including pucukan, genukan, and lengkeh. The filling found on the pucukan Wayang Kayon is a tree of life form that is the landscape perception as mountain and forest. The filling of the genukan and lengkeh on the Wayang Kayon Blumbangan figure shows the ponds, animals, plants, and/or mythological creatures formation that are the landscape perception as an ecosystem around a water source. The filling of the genukan and lengkeh on the Wayang Kayon Gapuran figure shows the gate formation that is the landscape perception as a landscape of sacred buildings. Wayang Kayon filling is depicted through pasemon artistic concept so that it is understood as native art. This research is expected to be a guide for shadow puppet spectators to understand the Wayang Kayon figures filling and for shadow puppet artists to pay attention to the Wayang Kayon filling results creations so that the interaction between fillings still perceives the landscape.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Pandu Pramudita, Institut Seni Indonesia, Surakarta

Mahasiswa S3 Institut Seni Indonesia, Surakarta

Sarwanto, Institut Seni Indonesia, Surakarta

Guru besar Institut Seni Indonesia, Surakarta

Soetarno, Institut Seni Indonesia, Surakarta

Guru besar Institut Seni Indonesia, Surakarta

Dendi Pratama, Politeknik Bina Madani, Bekasi

Direktur Politeknik Bina Madani, Bekasi

References

Abadía, O. M., Morales, M. R. G., & Pérez, E. P. (2012). “Naturalism” and The Interpretation of Cave Art. World Art, 2(2), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/21500894.2012.689258

Bos, E. (2015). Landscape painting adding a cultural value to the Dutch countryside. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 16(1), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2013.12.008

Densmore, F. (1941). The Native Art of The Chippewa. American Anthropologist, 43(4), 678–681. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1941.43.4.02a00290

Dharsono. (2007). Estetika. Rekayasa Sains.

Ernawati. (2020). Psikologis Dalam Seni: Katarsis Sebagai Representasi Dalam Karya Seni Rupa. DESKOVI: Art and Design Journal, 2(2), 105. https://doi.org/10.51804/deskovi.v2i2.521

Fakhira, G., Yeru, A. I., & Kusumanugraha, S. (2020). To Know, To See: Persepsi Bentuk Dalam Sebuah Ruang. EProceedings of Art & Design, 7(2), 6014–6021.

Gustami, S. P. (2008). Nukilan: Seni Ornamen Indonesia. Arindo.

Huda, M. N., & Saddhono, K. (2017). Wayang Purwa Gagrag Banyumasan dan Peran Wali. IBDA: Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Budaya, 15(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.24090/ibda.v15i1.2017.pp135-148

Junaedi, D. (2017). Estetika: Jalinan Subjek, Objek, dan Nilai (D. Riwayanto & Surajiya (eds.); 2nd ed.). ArtCiv.

Margawati, M. (2014). Memahami Persepsi Visual: Sumbangan Psikologi Kognitif dalam Seni dan Desain. ULTIMART: Jurnal Komunikasi Visual, 05(01), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.31937/ultimart.v7i2.387

Marwoto, O. H. (2014). Peran Penting Dalam Perkembangan Seni Islami Di Indonesia. CORAK Jurnal Seni Kriya, 3(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.24821/corak.v3i1.2346

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Phenomenology of Perception (C. Smith (ed.)). Routledge Classics. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781844653614.011

Mogensen, M. (1995). The Symbolistic Idea in Danish Painting: Young Girls in Nature. History of European Ideas, 20(1–3), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-6599(95)92963-u

Muhajirin. (2010). Dari Pohon Hayat sampai Gunungan Wayang Kulit Purwa: Sebuah Fenomena Transformasi Budaya. Imaji, 8(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.21831/imaji.v8i1.6656

Mulyono, S. (1984). Mengungkap Nilai Kefilsafatan yang Terkandung dalam Kayon Pewayangan [Universitas Gadjah Mada].

Negrin, L. (2006). Ornament and The Feminine. Feminist Theory, 7(2), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700106064421

Nelson, N. (2016). Kreativitas dan Motivasi dalam Pembelajaran Seni Lukis. Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 1(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v1i1.2016

Panofsky, E. (1955). Meaning in The Visual Arts: Papers in and on Art History. Doubleday & Anchor Books.

Powers, W. K. (2002). Review-Drawing on Cultural Memory: Self and Other in Native American Ledger Art. American Anthropologist, 104(2), 663–666. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2002.104.2.663

Pramudita, P., Pratama, D., & Sarwanto. (2019). Jagad Ageng and Jagad Alit in Traditional Kayon. Dewa Ruci, 14(2), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.33153/dewaruci.v14i2.2850

Rusdy, S. T. (2015). Semiotika & Filsafat Wayang: Analisis Kritis Pergelaran Wayang. Yayasan Kertagama.

Sabdho, W., & Basir, U. P. M. (2014). Makna Simbolis lan Nilai Filosofis Gunungan ing Pagelaran Wayang Kulit. Baradha, 2(3), 1–10.

Solichin, Suyanto, & Sumari. (2019). Ensiklopedi Wayang Indonesia (Edisi Revisi Aksara G-H-I) (Solichin, U. Wiyono, & S. Purwanto (eds.); 3th ed.). Mitra Sarana Edukasi & Sena Wangi.

Sumardjo, J. (2006). Estetika Paradoks (I. S. Dimyati (ed.)). Sunan Ambu Press.

Summa-Knoop, L. Di. (2014). Philosophical Aesthetics: A Naturalist Perspective. Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology, 1(2), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.2752/205393214X14083775794998

Sunarto. (1991). Bentuk dan Fungsi Kayon Wayang Kulit Purwo Gaya Yogyakarta [Institut Seni Indonesia Yogyakarta]. http://digilib.isi.ac.id/3193/

Sunaryo, A. (2009). Ornamen Nusantara: Kajian Khusus tentang Ornamen Indonesia. Dahara Prize.

Tolla, M. (2014). Landscape and Orientation of Megalithic Chambers in Mecklenburg-Vopommern (Nort Germany): Phenomenology Perspective. Jurnal Arkeologi Papua, 6(2), 135–141. https://doi.org/10. 24832/papua.v6i2.27

Wheeler, A.-M. (2017). The Porosity of Human/Non-human Beings in Neil Gaiman’s American Gods and Anansi Boys. In Indigenous Creature, Native Knowedges, and The Arts: Animal Studies in Modern Worlds (pp. 119–137). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56874-4_6

Zoetmulder, P. J. (2000). Manunggaling Kawula Gusti: Pantheisme dan Monisme dalam Sastra Suluk Jawa (D. Hartoko (ed.); 4th ed.). Gramedia.

Downloads

Published

22-02-2023

How to Cite

Pramudita, P., Sarwanto, S., Soetarno, S., & Pratama, D. (2023). The Landscape Perception as Pasemon Artistic in Wayang Kayon Figure. Mudra Jurnal Seni Budaya, 38(2), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v38i2.2096

Issue

Section

Articles
Loading...