Petulangan as a Field of Symbolic Production: Aesthetics, Knowledge, and Hierarchy in the Balinese Funerary Architecture

Authors

  • Made Gede Anadhi Master of Cultural Tourism Study Program, I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa State Hindu University
  • I Putu Gede Suyoga Master of Design Study Program, Bali Institute of Design and Business

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v41i1.3506

Keywords:

Petulangan, Power–Knowledge, Symbolic Capital, Aesthetic, Ritual Architecture, Balinese Funerary Art

Abstract

This article examines the petulangan in Balinese cremation ritual (ngaben) as a material articulation of power, knowledge, and social distinction. Moving beyond symbolic-descriptive interpretations of ritual architecture, the study positions the petulangan as a performative field in which cosmology, hierarchy, and aesthetic production converge. Employing a qualitative interpretive methodology grounded in visual ethnography and discourse analysis, fieldwork was conducted in Gianyar, Bali, involving observation, visual documentation, and interviews with undagi (traditional architects), priests, and customary leaders. The analysis integrates the theoretical frameworks of Michel Foucault’s power–knowledge nexus and Pierre Bourdieu’s concepts of field, habitus, and symbolic capital. From a Foucauldian perspective, the regulation of iconography, proportion, and ritual procedure constitutes a regime of aesthetic orthodoxy through which cosmological truth is stabilized and spiritual legitimacy is disciplined. The petulangan operates as a ritual technology that renders authority visible and socially binding. Through Bourdieu’s lens, cremation aesthetics are understood as a visual economy of distinction, wherein economic, cultural, and social capital are converted into symbolic capital. Monumentality, ornamentation, and artisanal refinement function as strategies of prestige, reproducing social hierarchy through sacred art. The study argues that the petulangan is not merely an ephemeral funerary structure but an active agent in the materialization of cultural politics. Although contemporary economic transformation and commercialization reshape patterns of patronage, the symbolic grammar of hierarchy and cosmological authority remains resilient. Ultimately, Balinese funerary architecture demonstrates how sacred aesthetics simultaneously honour the deceased and reproduce the social order of the living.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

I. D. M. Pastika, “Bentuk-bentuk Petulangan Dalam Upacara Ngaben Ditinjau Dari Sudut Kesenirupaan Di Bali,” Mudra Jurnal Seni Budaya, vol. 22, no. 1, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.31091/mudra.v22i1.1543.

C. Geertz, Negara: The Theatre State in Nineteenth-Century Bali. Princeton University Press, 1980.

F. B. Eiseman, Bali: Sekala and Niskala (Vol. 1): Essays on Religion, Ritual, and Art. . Periplus Editions, 1990.

L. Howe, The changing world of Bali: Religion, society and tourism. Routledge, 2005.

J. S. Lansing, Priests and Programmers: Technologies of Power in the Engineered Landscape of Bali, 1st ed. Princeton University Press, 1991.

M. Hobart, “After Culture: Anthropology as Radical Metaphysical Critique.” Yale Indonesian Forum, 2000.

M. Foucault, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. . Pantheon, 1980.

M. Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Pantheon, 1977.

P. Bourdieu, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Harvard University Press, 1984.

P. Bourdieu, The Field of Cultural Production. , 1st ed., vol. 1. Columbia University Press / Polity Press , 1993.

P. Bourdieu, The logic of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford University Press, 1990.

I. N. Laba, I. W. Adnyana, I. W. Suardana, and I. A. Gede Artayani, “Milestone Dan Makna Ornamen Puri Agung Karangasem Dalam Persfektif Hermeneutika,” Panggung, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 172–192, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.26742/panggung.v35i1.3632.

I. G. N. A. Jaya CK and I. W. Sukarya, "Dominasi Patra Punggel Sebagai Hiasan Dekorasi Pada Bangunan Wadah Di Badung," Segara Widya : Jurnal Penelitian Seni, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 149-177, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.31091/sw.v8i2.1193.

O. S. Kusumawardani and N. A. A. Winata, “Kebudayaan Bali Dengan Tradisi Upacara Ngaben Dalam Agama Hindu,” TANDA: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, Bahasa dan Sastra (e-ISSN: 2797-0477), vol. 2, no. 06, pp. 10–17, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.69957/tanda.v2i06.1857.

M. Picard, “Cultural tourism” in Bali: Cultural performances as tourist attraction. . Indonesia, 1990.

M. B. Bakan, Music of Death and New Creation: Experiences in the World of Balinese Gamelan Beleganjur. . New York: University of Chicago Press, 2012.

C. Warren, Adat and Dinas: Balinese communities in the Indonesian state. Oxford University Press, 1993.

I. N. Y. Segara, “Bade Beroda: Transformasi dan Komodifikasi Budaya dalam Upacara Ngaben di Bali,” Mudra Jurnal Seni Budaya, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 94–102, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.31091/mudra.v35i1.810.

A. A. S. D. Rahadiani, D. A. N. Sriastuti, and I. N. Suparyana, “Adaptasi Pelaksanaan Upacara Ngaben di Br.TegalKauh, Desa Pekraman Pohgading, Denpasar Utara,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 24–29, Mar. 2022.

J. S. Lansing, The Three Worlds of Bali. Praeger, 1983.

F. B. Eiseman, Bali: Sekala and Niskala (Vol. 1): Essays on Religion, Ritual, and Art. . Periplus Editions, 1990.

U. Ramseyer, The Art and Culture of Bali. Oxford University Press, 2002.

J. J. Fox, The Poetic Power of Place: Comparative Perspectives on Austronesian Ideas of Locality. . Australian National University Press, 1996.

G. MacRae, “‘The Value of a Good Death: The Politics of Funerals in Contemporary Bali.’ ,” Bijdr. Taal Land Volkenkd., vol. 167, no. 2, pp. 145–173, 2011.

I. W. Suyadnya, L. A. Tirtayani, A. Setiawan, and A. P. Lintangsari, “Ritual Kematian dan Duka Selama Pandemi COVID-19,” Mudra Jurnal Seni Budaya, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 226–238, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.31091/mudra.v37i3.1773.

I. W. Ardika and N. L. S. Beratha, Revitalisasi Warisan Budaya Bali dalam Pendidikan Karakter Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. Denpasar: Udayana University Press, 2021.

Downloads

Published

31-03-2026

How to Cite

Anadhi, M. G., & Suyoga, I. P. G. (2026). Petulangan as a Field of Symbolic Production: Aesthetics, Knowledge, and Hierarchy in the Balinese Funerary Architecture. Mudra Jurnal Seni Budaya, 41(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v41i1.3506

Issue

Section

Articles