Exploring Fear and Imagination: A Statement of Practice for “Parade Lorong Kosambi”

Authors

  • Rendy Pandita Bastari Desain Komunikasi Visual , Fakultas Industri Kreatif, Telkom University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v41i1.3139

Keywords:

Fear, Imagination, Photography, Drawing, Cultural Transmission, Practice-Based Research

Abstract

This statement of practice addresses not merely as a representational theme in visual art, but as a methodological catalyst that shapes artistic perception, decision-making, and meaning-making. The practice-based research explores how fear acts as an experiential and affective condition within the creative process, supporting observation, visual intervention, and material articulation. Using a combination of photography and drawing, the artwork “Parade Lorong Kosambi” juxtaposes photographic realism with drawn imaginary figures to see how imaginative intrusion disrupts the stability of everyday spaces. This study is grounded in a theoretical perspective on memetic transmission, drawing from Richard Dawkins and Richard Brodie to understand fear-related imagery as culturally circulating units, alongside psychoanalytic insights to reflect on fear as an unconscious driver or imaginative projection. These theories serve as interpretive lenses rather than explanatory models, supporting reflective decision-making throughout the practice-led process. The creative methodology involves site-specific observation, photographic documentation of urban locations, visual experimentation through culturally inspired sketching, and material realization using mixed media techniques. Rather than empirically analyzing audience reception, this statement of practice focuses on articulating how fear operates internally within artistic processes and manifests through visual and material strategies. This study contributes to contemporary art discourse by positioning fear as a source of experiential knowledge production within practice-led research. By framing artistic creation as a methodological inquiry into affection and imagination, the work demonstrates how fear can act as a legitimate epistemic force in artistic research, without relying on audience-based evaluation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Y. S. Lee, J. Y. Chang, and J. N. Choi, “Why Reject Creative Ideas? Fear as a Driver of Implicit Bias Against Creativity,” Creat. Res. J., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 225–235, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1080/10400419.2017.1360061.

S. Hoffmann and C. Robin, “Fear: The History of a Political Idea,” Foreign Aff., vol. 84, no. 1, p. 188, 2004, doi: 10.2307/20034239.

M. W. Pfau, “Who’s Afraid of Fear Appeals? Contingency, Courage and Deliberation in Rhetorical Theory and Practice,” Philos. Rhetor., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 216–237, 2007, doi: 10.1353/PAR.2007.0024.

P. N. Stearns, “Fear and Contemporary History: A Review Essay,” J. Soc. Hist., vol. 40, no. 2, 2006, doi: 10.1353/JSH.2007.0033.

S. Lash, Sociology of postmodernism. Taylor and Francis, 2014.

I. Riccioni, “Narration through Images. The Social Role of the Graphic Story in the Work of Fortunato Depero.,” Proc. Int. Interdiscip. Conf. Immagin. Brixen, Italy, 27–28 Novemb. 2017., p. 966, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.3390/PROCEEDINGS1090966.

Y. Beris, “Effects of Digital Printing Applications on Contemporary Art,” Proc. 9th Int. Symp. Graph. Eng. Des., pp. 499–507, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.24867/GRID-2018-P60.

T. Catoira and C. X. De Azevedo Netto, “The importance of a differentiated representation of information for Contemporary Art: Use of fruition as a classification attribute,” Transinformação, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 263–274, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1590/2318-08892016000300002.

M. Throp, “Correlating theory and practice in fine art research: understanding practice as research; seminars for first year PhD students,” J. Vis. Art Pract., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 4–9, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/14702029.2016.1141567.

P. S. Wardrip and L. Brahms, “Learning practices of making: developing a framework for design,” Int. Conf. Interact. Des. Child., pp. 375–378, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1145/2771839.2771920.

P. Dafiotis, “Art practice as a form of research in art education,” Debates Art Des. Educ., pp. 148–163, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.4324/9780203100714-23.

E. Pérez, “Academic research and artistic practice in Chain Reaction: Methodology on Two Levels,” Nord. J. Art Res., vol. 3, no. 1, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.7577/IF.V3I1.940.

H. R. Djahwasi and Z. L. Saidon, “Artistic Research: Artistic as Research vs Artistic as Method,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 10, no. 11, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.6007/IJARBSS/V10-I11/8091.

K. Lewandowska and E. Kulczycki, “Academic research evaluation in artistic disciplines: the case of Poland,” Assess. &Amp; Eval. High. Educ., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 284–296, 2022, doi: 10.1080/02602938.2021.1893651.

A. Gerber, “Drawing the Line: Evaluation, Boundary Work, and Boundary Objects in a New Discipline,” Cult. Sociol. Art Music New Dir. New Discov. Cult. Sociol., 2022, doi: 10.31235/OSF.IO/YXEF4.

C. E. Akpang, “Analysing art and artworks: introducing new theoretical frameworks to address the problem of art appreciation and criticism in universities/colleges,” J. Vis. Lit., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2021, doi: 10.1080/1051144X.2021.1994729.

R. Dawkins, The Selfish Gene, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

R. Brodie and C. M. (Translator) Hermaya, T. Udiani, Virus Of The Mind (Trans.). Jakarta: KPG Gramedia, 2005.

J. P. Casibual, “Of women and monsters: A case study of Philippine creature urban legends,” Southeast. Philipp. J. Res. Dev., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 23–34, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.53899/SPJRD.V27I2.143.

J. Grimm, “Path to Victory,” It Follow., pp. 83–88, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.3828/LIVERPOOL/9781911325581.003.0007.

A. Crabtree and J. R. Masuda, “Naloxone urban legends and the opioid crisis: what is the role of public health?,” BMC Public Health, vol. 19, no. 1, May 2019, doi: 10.1186/S12889-019-7033-5.

E. M. Cotter, “Influence of Emotional Content and Perceived Relevance on Spread of Urban Legends: A Pilot Study,” Psychol. Rep., vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 623–629, Apr. 2008, doi: 10.2466/PR0.102.2.623-629.

A. Boessen, J. R. Hipp, C. T. Butts, N. N. Nagle, and E. J. Smith, “Social fabric and fear of crime: Considering spatial location and time of day,” Soc. Networks, vol. 51, pp. 60–72, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.SOCNET.2016.12.001.

K. Bell, “Civic Spirits?,” Cult. Soc. Hist., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 51–68, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.2752/147800414X13802176314483.

I. Niehaus, “On the mobility of ghosts: spectral journeys in the South African lowveld,” Africa (Lond)., vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 159–176, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1017/S0001972023000141.

C. Schwenkel, “Haunted Infrastructure: Religious Ruins and Urban Obstruction in Vietnam,” City &Amp; Soc., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 413–434, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1111/CISO.12142.

A. M. Leshkowich, “Wandering Ghosts of Late Socialism: Conflict, Metaphor, and Memory in a Southern Vietnamese Marketplace,” J. Asian Stud., vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 5–41, 2008, doi: 10.1017/S0021911808000016.

S. Freud, Civilization and its Discontents, 3rd ed. London: Penguin Grioup, 2004.

S. Starkstein, “Sigmund Freud and the Psychoanalytical Concept of Fear and Anxiety,” A Concept. Ther. Anal. Fear, pp. 231–257, 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-78349-9_8.

K. T. Strongman, “Theories of anxiety,” NZ. J. Psychol., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 4–10, 1995, Accessed: Aug. 15, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://natlib.govt.nz/records/21485448.

M. Q. Tanudjaja and J. M. J. P. Santoso, “PENGADAAN DESTINASI WISATA EDUKASI DAN RUANG TERBUKA SEBAGAI UPAYA OPTIMALISASI WISATA KOTA TUA,” J. Sains, Teknol. Urban, Perancangan, Arsit., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1431–1446, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.24912/STUPA.V4I2.22057.

A. S. Titisari, L. K. R. Swandewi, C. Warren, and A. Reid, “Stories of women’s marriage and fertility experiences: Qualitative research on urban and rural cases in Bali, Indonesia,” Gates Open Res., vol. 7, p. 124, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.12688/GATESOPENRES.14781.1.

Rismayani, A. Paliling, A. Nurhidayani, and M. Pineng, “Fundamental Design of Flood Management Educational Games Using Virtual Reality Technology,” Int. J. Online Biomed. Eng., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 19–32, 2022, doi: 10.3991/IJOE.V18I03.27787.

N. Carroll, The philosophy of horror, or, Paradoxes of the heart. Taylor & Francis, 2004.

R. P. Bastari and A. T. H. Siregar, “Urban Paranoia II,” J. Vis. Art Des., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 28–37, 2017, doi: 10.5614/j.vad.2017.9.1.3.

M. Isa Pramana Koesoemadinata, “Visual Adaptation Of Wayang Characters In Teguh Santosaâ€TMs Comic Art,” Mudra J. Seni Budaya, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 401–408, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.31091/MUDRA.V33I3.544.

“Wayang Kulit: Indonesia’s Extraordinary Shadow Puppetry Tradition | Asia Society.” https://asiasociety.org/new-york/wayang-kulit-indonesias-extraordinary-shadow-puppetry-tradition (accessed Aug. 15, 2024).

M. D. Foster, “Yokai Culture: Past, Present, Future,” Pandemonium Parad. Monsters Cult. Yokai, pp. 204–216, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1525/CALIFORNIA/9780520253612.003.0006.

K. D. Alche, “Fairy Tales, Legends and Yokai. the Traditional Japanese Society Through Its Own Fantasy Literature,” no. May, 2020.

A. J. Elliot, “Color and psychological functioning: A review of theoretical and empirical work,” Front. Psychol., vol. 6, no. APR, p. 127893, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.3389/FPSYG.2015.00368/BIBTEX.

M. D. Foster, Pandemonium and parade : Japanese monsters and the culture of yookai. University of California Press, 2009.

Downloads

Published

31-03-2026

How to Cite

Bastari, R. P. (2026). Exploring Fear and Imagination: A Statement of Practice for “Parade Lorong Kosambi”. Mudra Jurnal Seni Budaya, 41(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.31091/mudra.v41i1.3139

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)