Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, RTF, or WordPerfect document file format.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines, which is found in About the Journal.
  • If submitting to a peer-reviewed section of the journal, the instructions in Ensuring a Blind Review have been followed.

Author Guidelines

PANDUAN PENULISAN JOMSTI

 

  • Artikel dibuat dalam bahasa Indonesia atau Inggris, orisinal (bukan jiplakan), dan belum pernah atau tidak sedang dalam proses dipublikasikan dan/atau dikirimkan untuk dipublikasikan ke terbitan lainnya.
  • Identitas penulis ditulis lengkap tanpa gelar dan bila terdiri atas beberapa penulis dengan instansi yang berbeda, di belakang setiap nama diberikan indeks.
  • Di bawah nama penulis ditulis nama instansi penulis (kalau ada) dan alamat email penulis.
  • Panjang artikel 10 sampai 15 halaman atau menyesuaikan dengan isi dan sifat studi yang mendasari artikel, spasi 1,5, huruf MS Word dengan tipe Arial, ukuran 12.
  • Judul dibuat singkat dan jelas serta tidak lebih dari 15 kata.
  • ABSTRAK/ABSTRACT, antara 200 hingga 250 kata, dilengkapi dengan kata-kata kunci pada bagian bawah halaman yang diurutkan berdasarkan kepentingannya. Abstrak dibuat dalam satu paragraf yang mengandung (1) tujuan studi, (2) metode yang digunakan, (3) hasil studi serta pembahasannya, dan (4) implikasi/makna/penerapan/tindak lanjut hasil studi.
  • PENDAHULUAN/ INTRODUCTION, berisi latar belakang, ruang lingkup, studi-studi terkait, serta tujuan dan manfaat studi.
  • METODE/METHODS, mengandung uraian rinci dan jelas mengenai bahan dan metode yang digunakan, proses pencarian data, dan cara analisis data.
  • HASIL DAN PEMBAHASAN/ RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ditulis secara bersama-sama. Setiap hasil disertai dengan pembahasan. Pembahasan dikaitkan dengan hasil studi dari laporan-laporan yang ada sebelumnya atau saat ini, baik dari sumber penulis sendiri maupun dari sumber artikel orang lain. Hindari pengulangan pernyataan yang sudah ditulis sebelumnya. Artikel dimungkinkan untuk dilengkapi tabel, grafik, bagan, peta, dan foto.
  • SIMPULAN DAN SARAN/ CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION. Simpulan wajib dibuat sedangkan saran atau rekomendasi bersifat opsional. Simpulan disajikan secara terpisah dari hasil dan pembahasan. Saran (jika ada) disajikan secara terpisah dari simpulan. 
  • UCAPAN TERIMA KASIH/ ACKNOWLEDGMENT (jika ada), ditujukan kepada pihak-pihak yang telah membantu baik melalui fasilitas maupun pendanaan serta pihak-pihak yang telah membantu proses studi dan/atau penulisannya.
  • REFERENSI/REFERENCES ditulis dengan model Harvard, disusun secara alfabetis menurut nama dan tahun terbit. Referensi hanya memuat sumber-sumber yang memang digunakan dalam artikel.
  • DAFTAR PUSTAKA. Semua rujukan yang dikutip dalam naskah artikel atau hasil penelitian ilmiah harus tercantum dalam daftar pustaka. Daftar pustaka diketik 1 spasi dan disusun berdasarkan abjad.
  1. Diutamakan sumber pustaka: jurnal, paten, disertasi, tesis dan proseding aktual.
  2. Merujuk pada naskah yang telah diterbitkan di Jurnal Nasional dan Internasional.
  3. Pustaka dari internet (sumber online) yang dapat digunakan adalah jurnal dan pustaka dari instansi pemerintah atau swasta.

 

  • KETENTUAN PENGUTIPAN DENGAN BODYNOTE
  1. Penulisan nama penulis dalam kutipan cukup 1 kata pada nama akhir penulis jika nama terdiri dari dua kata atau lebih: Suka Hardjana, cukup ditulis Hardjana; Dieter Mack, cukup ditulis Mack
  2. Sumber kutipan ditulis di awal kalimat atau awal teks:

1)  Satu sumber kutipan dengan satu penulis: Griffiths (dalam Ardini) menyatakan bahwa...; jika disertai dengan halaman: Griffiths (2010: 23) berpendapat bahwa...; Menurut Hardjana (2004: 197) ...

2)  Satu sumber kutipan dengan dua penulis: Harnish dan Rasmussen (2011: 20) …

3)  Satu sumber kutipan lebih dari dua penulis: Hansen et al. (2012: 93) …

  1. Sumber kutipan ditulis di akhir kalimat atau akhir teks:

1)  Satu sumber kutipan dengan satu penulis: ... (Hardjana, 2004) ; jika disertai dengan halaman:.......... (Hardjana, 2004: 197)

2)  Satu sumber kutipan dengan dua penulis: ... (Harnish dan Rasmussen, 2011: 20)

3)  Satu sumber kutipan lebih dari dua penulis: … (Hansen et al, 2012: 93)

  1. Dua sumber kutipan dengan penulis yang sama: (Rice, 2001, 2007); jika nama dan tahun publikasi sama: (Rice, 2007, 2007a).
  2. Sumber kutipan berupa banyak pustaka dengan penulis yang berbeda-beda: (Frith, 1997; Harnish dan Rasmussen, 2011; Guan et al., 2000).
  3. Sumber kutipan tidak menyebut nama penulis, tetapi menyebut suatu lembaga atau badan tertentu: Badan Pusat Statistik (2006).
  4. Sumber kutipan tidak menyebut nama penulis, tetapi menyebut suatu peraturan atau undang-undang: Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2017.......; Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 10 Tahun 2014......; Pernyataan Standar Pelayanan Minimal Bidang Kesenian Nomor 85 Tahun 2014......
  5. Kutipan berasal dari sumber kedua: Griffiths (2010)  dalam Ardini (2016: 23).......; Paul Griffiths (lihat Ardini, 2016: 23).....; Paul Griffiths (2010) seperti dikutip Ardini (2016: 23).... [Catatan: daftar pustaka hanya mencantumkan referensi yang merupakan sumber kedua].

 

  • Pengiriman Tulisan. Tulisan dikirim kealamat email Journal of Music, Science, Technology, and Industry, yakni : [email protected] Tulisan yang diterima akan melewati proses editing dan review. Korespondensi dilakukan antara pengelola dan penulis dalam proses tersebut.
  • Ketentuan Orginalitas. Untuk menghindari praktek plagiarisme, pengelola Jomsti menyarankan untuk menggunakan software Plagiarism Checker dengan ambang batas 30%. Oleh karena itu, penulis dimohon menghindari penggunaan kalimat yang identik dengan sumber secara berlebihan atau copy paste dari tulisan lain. Praktik plagarisme, bila terjadi, di luar tanggung jawab pengelola jurnal.

Privacy Statement

Our Publication Ethics are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Duties of Authors

Reporting Standards: Authors should present an accurate account of the original research performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Researchers should present their results honestly and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation. A manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. Manuscripts should follow the submission guidelines of the journal.
Originality and Plagiarism: Authors must ensure that they have written entirely original work. The manuscript should not be submitted concurrently to more than one publication unless the editors have agreed to co-publication. Relevant previous work and publications, both by other researchers and the authors’ own, should be properly acknowledged and referenced. The primary literature should be cited where possible. Original wording taken directly from publications by other researchers should appear in quotation marks with the appropriate citations.
Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publications: Author should not in general submit the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently. It is also expected that the author will not publish redundant manuscripts or manuscripts describing same research in more than one journal. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. Multiple publications arising from a single research project should be clearly identified as such and the primary publication should be referenced
Acknowledgement of Sources: Authors should acknowledge all sources of data used in the research and cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given.
Authorship of the Paper: The authorship of research publications should accurately reflect individuals’ contributions to the work and its reporting. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to conception, design, execution or interpretation of the reported study. Others who have made significant contribution must be listed as co-authors. In cases where major contributors are listed as authors while those who made less substantial, or purely technical, contributions to the research or to the publication are listed in an acknowledgement section. Authors also ensure that all the authors have seen and agreed to the submitted version of the manuscript and their inclusion of names as co-authors.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: All authors should clearly disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental Errors in Published Works: If the author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in the submitted manuscript, then the author should promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects: The author should clearly identify in the manuscript if the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use.

Duties of Editor

Publication Decisions: Based on the review report of the editorial board, the editor can accept, reject, or request modifications to the manuscript. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. Editors have to take responsibility for everything they publish and should have procedures and policies in place to ensure the quality of the material they publish and maintain the integrity of the published record.
Review of Manuscripts: Editor must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. The editor should organize and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer reviewed. Editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that are considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.
Fair Play: The editor must ensure that each manuscript received by the journal is reviewed for its intellectual content without regard to sex, gender, race, religion, citizenship, etc. of the authors. An important part of the responsibility to make fair and unbiased decisions is the upholding of the principle of editorial independence and integrity. Editors are in a powerful position by making decisions on publications, which makes it very important that this process is as fair and unbiased as possible.
Confidentiality: The editor must ensure that information regarding manuscripts submitted by the authors is kept confidential. Editors should critically assess any potential breaches of data protection and patient confidentiality. This includes requiring properly informed consent for the actual research presented, consent for publication where applicable.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: The editor of the Journal will not use unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript for his own research without written consent of the author. Editors should not be involved in decisions about papers in which they have a conflict of interest

Duties of Reviewers

Confidentiality: Information regarding manuscripts submitted by authors should be kept confidential and be treated as privileged information. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Acknowledgement of Sources: Reviewers must ensure that authors have acknowledged all sources of data used in the research. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. The reviewers should notify the journal immediately if they come across any irregularities, have concerns about ethical aspects of the work, are aware of substantial similarity between the manuscript and a concurrent submission to another journal or a published article, or suspect that misconduct may have occurred during either the research or the writing and submission of the manuscript; reviewers should, however, keep their concerns confidential and not personally investigate further unless the journal asks for further information or advice.
Standards of Objectivity: Review of submitted manuscripts must be done objectively and the reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. The reviewers should follow journals’ instructions on the specific feedback that is required of them and, unless there are good reasons not to. The reviewers should be constructive in their reviews and provide feedback that will help the authors to improve their manuscript. The reviewer should make clear which suggested additional investigations are essential to support claims made in the manuscript under consideration and which will just strengthen or extend the work
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. In the case of double-blind review, if they suspect the identity of the author(s) notify the journal if this knowledge raises any potential conflict of interest.
Promptness: The reviewers should respond in a reasonable time-frame. The reviewers only agree to review a manuscript if they are fairly confident they can return a review within the proposed or mutually agreed time-frame, informing the journal promptly if they require an extension. In the event that a reviewer feels it is not possible for him/her to complete review of manuscript within stipulated time then this information must be communicated to the editor, so that the manuscript could be sent to another reviewer.